But I also know that many of them aren't all that unhappy with their choices, they prefer sympathy to working at changing their life. I know they are not all bad, I help the ones who truly wish to change their circumstance by having the phone numbers of the agencies they can turn to. And I can't really relate to a story of a man who felt guilty for working for 12 hours a day, as opposed to wandering around demanding that someone take care of them. And working around them means I have to wade through their trash and excrement, be threatened on regular basis, and generally take their abuse as they hide behind the pity. If a person has something and they don't, they feel they have a right to take it or break it. Living in areas they inhabit means that anything not tied down will be stolen since they have a huge sense of entitlement. Call me cruel, or heartless, but I am not all that tender towards the homeless. To really get a feel for this story, I would have to accept every premise he writes, and I don't. Unlike Grisham, I do not merely research the homeless through some interviews, I have lived in areas where they reside and work in areas where I have to clean up after them. It wasn't altogether bad, just not something I could get into since it became obvious that Grisham just want to spout his political views rather than giving an honest story.

I did not read these together, I read The Client a long time ago and enjoyed it.

The street lawyer review